• about KDD
  • Looking for something?
    • Allover
    • Conversation pieces
    • Historical excursions
    • Short films
    • making / art
    • favourite places
    • dogologue
    • Tutorials
      • Tarradale tutorial
      • shoe size tables (for sock sizing guidance)
      • Crochet provisional cast on (tutorial)
      • two-colour grafting
  • shop
Start typing and press
Enter to search
Skip to content
KDD & Co

KDD & Co

Award-winning Scottish publishing and design

open search form close search form
  • about KDD
  • Looking for something?
    • Allover
    • Conversation pieces
    • Historical excursions
    • Short films
    • making / art
    • favourite places
    • dogologue
    • Tutorials
      • Tarradale tutorial
      • shoe size tables (for sock sizing guidance)
      • Crochet provisional cast on (tutorial)
      • two-colour grafting
  • shop
By: Kate Davies Designs August 23, 2012
fashion, Historyfashion, fashion history, History, Paul Poiret

suit of the day

This Poiret suit is from 1914. I love its lines so much. I know I would be rubbish at actually walking in that skirt, though. Bring on the 1920s, and the knee.

Share this:

  • Twitter

Like this:

Like Loading...

Related

fashion, Historyfashion, fashion history, History, Paul Poiret

Post navigation

on the move
preparations
28 replies to suit of the day
  1. clairelwebster says:
    August 28, 2012 at 9:36 am

    Interesting photograph. Much of what we see of this era is couture and therefore unavailable to the masses: fashion for the very well off in a world where every detail of your life marked your social class. This is department store, off-the-peg and stylish. An inspiration and a breakthrough. Thanks for posting it – I’ve had really good think!!

    LikeLike

    Reply
  2. Ellen says:
    August 27, 2012 at 1:09 pm

    Slight correction – wikipedia says it was connected by elastic and worn just below the knee.

    LikeLike

    Reply
  3. Ellen says:
    August 27, 2012 at 1:06 pm

    These were called hobble skirts. If they were really tight they actually had a contraption that was a cuff connected by chain you attached at knee level to keep you from taking a step so big that you’d tear the skirt. If you want the look, make a slash or kick pleat so you can walk freely but still get the silhouette.

    LikeLike

    Reply
  4. Amy says:
    August 26, 2012 at 8:20 am

    Absolutely gorgeous. Thank you so much for sharing it!

    LikeLike

    Reply
  5. Candice in Georgetown, ON, Canada says:
    August 24, 2012 at 9:49 pm

    Such radical changes in style from 1907 to 1914 to 1921. Kind of like 1957 to 1964 to 1971. Where have we gone wrong? Seven years ago – 2005 – looked pretty much like 1998 and 2012. I’m ready for something new!

    LikeLike

    Reply
    1. Laura says:
      August 24, 2012 at 10:03 pm

      Well, I’m in favor of some of the radical world events that took place in the years 1907-1921, like flight, and women’s suffrage, which I think fashion reflected. However if it means the modern day equivalent of multinational trench warfare to initiate “something new in style,” then…no.

      LikeLike

      Reply
      1. Candice in Georgetown, ON, Canada says:
        August 25, 2012 at 5:22 pm

        Multinational warfare! My!

        LikeLike

        Reply
  6. Goldie Sagan says:
    August 24, 2012 at 5:55 pm

    Long skirts are elegant. The skirts designed in the 20’s were wider at the bottom and helped with a pleat or two. I wear modern versions all summer. Mine have slits on both sides making strides easy and letting in cool breezes.

    LikeLike

    Reply
  7. Bizzilizzi says:
    August 24, 2012 at 7:46 am

    These clothes just had such style………….

    LikeLike

    Reply
  8. Christina says:
    August 24, 2012 at 3:46 am

    I too love Poiret designs, and I think this one could easily be adapted for today. The collar and cuffs don’t need to be starched and the skirt could easily be shortened, especially as the focus of the design is the jacket cutaway to reveal the double breasted vest.

    The model doesn’t look pregnant to me, the pose is meant to reinforce the idea that the body is uncorseted (?) I think. Photos from this time are often similar to this.

    I am old enough to have worn longer skirts in the 70’s too, and I did – ankle length, in fact. They were so much better than mini skirts when dealing with babies and getting them in and out of their various car restraints.

    LikeLike

    Reply
  9. Lynn says:
    August 24, 2012 at 2:02 am

    Anne, Wanamaker’s was a famous Philadelphia dept. store. It went out of business in the last 10 or so years, and became a Macy’s. It was a Philly icon and has been preserved with one of the largest organs around, and the famous meet me at the eagle statue. No doubt Poiret along with other designers did designs for a specific store and market.

    LikeLike

    Reply
  10. Elaine says:
    August 23, 2012 at 11:56 pm

    The jacket is gorgeous!! I think I have a “similar” style jacket hiding in a closet somewhere! Thank you once again for sharing.
    When is your book going to be available??

    LikeLike

    Reply
  11. Elizabeth says:
    August 23, 2012 at 8:58 pm

    Love the suit, even with the length (maybe because of it). Really, I think this period produced some of the most attractive silhouettes in women’s clothing–just think of the movie “Out of Africa”. I remember coming across the name Poiret while reading an Elizabeth Peters mystery set around the time of the Great War, and now you’ve satisfied my curiosity. Is it my imagination, or does the model look slightly pregnant?

    LikeLike

    Reply
  12. Pam says:
    August 23, 2012 at 7:33 pm

    Fun to see the Wanamaker name on your photo, Kate – I remember shopping with my grandmother at a branch of the old John Wanamaker store, in Lancaster, Pennsylvania. Never got to the one in Philadelphia – the organ there is the largest functional pipe organ in the world. My family wasn’t so fashionable as this picture… most of my female relative are wearing the typical puffy white blouse and crinoline skirt!

    LikeLike

    Reply
  13. frayedattheedge says:
    August 23, 2012 at 6:15 pm

    As one who is old enough to have worn maxi skirts in the late sixties/early seventies ……. yes, they were awkward and inelegant to walk in!!

    LikeLike

    Reply
  14. Laura says:
    August 23, 2012 at 5:52 pm

    I love this outfit, too! In fact, except for the hobble skirt, I’ve always liked this period’s fashions. I think my first experience with them might have been on Upstairs, Downstairs, on the beautiful Hazel, (Meg Wynn-Owen) during the post Lady Marjorie, WWI years of that series.

    LikeLike

    Reply
  15. Lois Morgan says:
    August 23, 2012 at 3:50 pm

    My grandmother was married in 1914,and I remember seeing some photos of her on her honeymoon and being so in awe of her clothes, although not as stunning as that suit! She lived so many generations of fashion, being born in 1894 and living until 1994~

    LikeLike

    Reply
  16. KathleenC says:
    August 23, 2012 at 2:56 pm

    Like wearabledesign I’m a costume designer too. Poiret is so interesting for costumes… his sense of drama in clothing was so strong even everyday dress looks like a costume.
    Quite a confident man; he claimed to have defeated the corset and freed modern woman (htough you wouldn’t say so looking at the skirt width). Sadly for him he died a pauper… his aesthetic just couldn’t keep up with the times.
    And for MaryKate… her hair is long under that hat. Bobbed hairdos were a few years still in the future.

    LikeLike

    Reply
  17. lopezkriss says:
    August 23, 2012 at 2:12 pm

    The original Wanamaker’s store, in Center City Philadelphia, is now a Macy’s. Its still beautiful though as many of the original fixtures, and of course the organ, are still there. They do daily organ concerts. Definitely worth a wander through if you’re ever in the area.
    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wanamaker's

    LikeLike

    Reply
  18. wearabledesign says:
    August 23, 2012 at 1:19 pm

    I love Poiret! I visited this exhibition on Poiret years ago in Paris, it was during my fashion design studies and it was very inspiring. It was also one of the reasons for me to get more interested in the history of fashion than actually designing myself. Hmmm, maybe that’s why i became a costume designer…

    LikeLike

    Reply
  19. Marykate says:
    August 23, 2012 at 1:05 pm

    That hat is what I like best. I wonder what she’s got going on with her hair under there – long and tied up or short?

    LikeLike

    Reply
  20. Kathy says:
    August 23, 2012 at 1:05 pm

    I have a skirt roughly that length – it didn’t overly bother me except for the day I had to walk uphill to a job interview. I hitched it up to knee level and hoped nobody important saw me!

    LikeLike

    Reply
  21. Karen says:
    August 23, 2012 at 12:39 pm

    Love it. Absolutely adorable! Oh how I wish we could wear those fashions. So Downton Abbey!

    LikeLike

    Reply
  22. susan says:
    August 23, 2012 at 12:37 pm

    I agree, lines are lovely. However…….having to wear starched uniforms as a pupil nurse then pupil midwife i ‘chafe’ at the thought of those cuffs and the collar! Fun to look at though.

    LikeLike

    Reply
  23. Camille Ludlow says:
    August 23, 2012 at 12:34 pm

    Wanamaker’s was a dept. store in the states. Evidently they must have sold this suit. I love the jacket too, especially with the vest underneath peeking out.

    LikeLike

    Reply
  24. Kim Bruce says:
    August 23, 2012 at 12:21 pm

    This looks so modern and lovely. At least it’s not hobbled at the bottom of the skirt! To think of all the things women managed to do in long skirts – I couldn’t get through the day.

    LikeLike

    Reply
  25. Anne, Milton Ontario says:
    August 23, 2012 at 12:21 pm

    What is the significance of the “Wanamaker” notation……do you know?

    Can you imagine having to walk around with your skirts dragging everywhere? How did they keep it clean?The detail is wonderful though…look at those cuffs, and the hem……wow….

    LikeLike

    Reply
    1. Natalie L. says:
      August 23, 2012 at 12:36 pm

      Wanamaker’s was a department store in the US.

      LikeLike

      Reply

comment here Cancel reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

Gravatar
WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. ( Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. ( Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. ( Log Out /  Change )

Cancel

Connecting to %s

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

allover

short films

Tom’s photography

historical excursions

conversation pieces

making / art

favourite places

dogologue

Need yarn?

our books

sign up for our shop newsletter

About Wheesht

Handywoman Tedx talk

awards for KDD

support BIPOC in Fiber

browse through the blog archives

Search this blog

Website Built with WordPress.com.
  • Follow Following
    • KDD & Co
    • Join 30,886 other followers
    • Already have a WordPress.com account? Log in now.
    • KDD & Co
    • Customize
    • Follow Following
    • Sign up
    • Log in
    • Copy shortlink
    • Report this content
    • View post in Reader
    • Manage subscriptions
    • Collapse this bar
 

Loading Comments...
 

    %d bloggers like this: