When do you read something over again? There are crime novels to which I frequently return (those of Josephine Tey and Marjorie Allingham are particular favourites) and, when I’m ill or low, I often pick up books enjoyed in childhood (Paul Gallico, Giovanni Guareschi). My main reading for pleasure now tends to be non-fiction, and though I often mark up passages or pages, in case I later want to follow a train of thought, I can’t think of an instance as an adult in which I’ve finished a book that I’ve enjoyed and then felt compelled to sit down and read it all over again. That’s until a couple of weeks ago, when I read, and then subsequently re-read, Peter Pomerantsev’s This is Not Propaganda. Completing this book, I was left with a vaguely aghast feeling, similar to the one I experienced in October 2016 after watching Hypernormalisation. But I also felt that Pomerantsev was someone whose joined-up thinking had so much more humanity and insight in it than that of Adam Curtis (who has always seemed to me to revel in his own apocalyptic jouissance just a little bit too much). Gripped by Pomerantsev’s combination of global sweep and personal detail, his deft and careful handling of some really complicated issues, and his distinctive tone – a sort of urgent melancholia – I sat down and read his book again.
Over the past four years, I, like many people, have read a whole lot of books whose subject might be broadly categorised as Where Are We Now and Where Might We be Going Next? I’ve read books by philosophers and economists. Books about representation and its lack, about the state of public discourse, about privacy and data. I’ve read books about our collective psychology and the possible futures of political theory and praxis. I’ve read more books, from more genres, and much more hungrily, than I’ve ever done before, and one reason for this is that reading has become my way of interrogating and addressing my own personal sense of disillusion – from the way that English debates about Brexit – especially those concerning immigration, race and difference – have articulated my separation from the working-class communities I grew up among; to my rising unease at the online world’s transition from a knowledge / sharing economy to an attention economy; to my horror at the real-world impacts of the debasement of political discourse to the lowest common denominator. After my first reading of Pomerantsev’s book, I felt I’d been far too bound up in the bubble of my own disenchantment, and that there were many other places I should have been looking for answers to my questions. One of those places is certainly Russia, somewhere about which I know very little, and which is the place Pomerantsev had left under his own cloud of disillusion in 2010, having experienced “a world where spectacle had pushed out sense, which left gut feeling as the only means of finding one’s way through the fog of disinformation.”
But Russia simply followed Pomerantsev back to the place to which his own parents had escaped the Soviet regime a generation earlier – England. By 2016, he writes: “the Russia I had known seemed to be all around me: a radical relativism which implies truth is unknowable, the future dissolving into nasty nostalgias, conspiracy replacing ideology, facts equating to fibs, conversation collapsing into mutual accusations that every argument is information warfare . . . and just this sense that everything under one’s feet is constantly moving, inherently unstable, liquid.”
With nowhere to hide, Pomerantsev’s response is to look right at the spectacle rather than to run away. And his gaze in this book is as unflinching as it is curious. We meet the brave Fillipina journalists who pay for questioning Duterte with their own reputations and the Mexican nurse who is brutally executed for her creation of an online persona fearlessly attacking her city’s narco gangs. We hear about the persuasive falsehoods that drove ISIS recruitment in South Yorkshire, alongside determined attempts to convey the truth of the siege of Aleppo, and the world’s indifference to that truth. Following trails of sock puppets, pop-up populists, and power, we travel from Belgrade to Kiev, from Tallinn to Chernivtsi, to Florida, where the bots of St Petersburg motivate Trump’s base to acts of parodic street theatre and to China, where the idea of 2049 is cast as a sort of millenarian ending to disinformation’s final spectacle. And finally, we return to Brexit Britain where “the best-selling newspaper accuses independent judges of being Enemies of the People, calls for the crushing of saboteurs who oppose the government, in language popularised in the Soviet Union to validate mass murder, and whose use today only serves to debase the memory of those misdeeds.”
Alongside his investigation of our flattened-out, futureless present, Pomerantsev also tells the story of his own past, from his parents’ determinedly creative dissidence to his own utopian sense of the potential of being European as the ability to “move between different [identities] and wear them lightly” during his education at a multi-lingual, multi-cultural school in Munich. On this journey, Pomerantsev encounters the sharp edges of his own personal disenchantment many times, and I often came up against mine too, particularly in the book’s conversation with Chantal Mouffe – an activist writer I once very much admired during my lefty student days, and whose current advocacy for a form of populism which merely echoes the worst discursive excesses of the right I find deeply disturbing and disappointing.
It might sound weird to say that I found a book about a futureless present comforting, but for me that was the case. And perhaps it was this cold comfort that I wanted to retain as I sat right down to read the book again. All I can say is that disenchantment is not the same as hopelessness and that, like Pomerantsev, I’d rather look straight at a problem than avoid it. This is a book that made me see things differently, and which also startled me with its humanity, alongside the clarity of its vision. Perhaps when the fog of disillusion next descends, as it is sure to, I’ll feel the need to pick it up again.
Peter Pomerantsev, This is Not Propaganda: Adventures in the War Against Reality (Faber & Faber, 2019) ISBN: 9780571338634. Seek it out from your local independent bookseller!
Whoops, Garrels wrote Putin Country, Anna Politkovskaya wrote Putin’s Russia, a fiery condemnation of Putin’s rule as it’s reflected at every level of Russian government. She was assassinated in 2006.
LikeLike
I borrowed this book from the library (electronically) as soon as I read this post. I just began, but I sense the terrible process of scales falling from my eyes already. I think this is going to be relevant reading material as I and other Americans approach our presidential elections in fall. I see there is a chapter on Chernivtsi, a Ukrainian city. I served there as a Peace Corps volunteer. As a student of Russian language and culture and an American, I recommend Putin’s Russia, by Anne Garrels. It’s strangely relevant to American politics at the moment. Let’s hope democracy survives this dark time.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Ordered This is Not Propaganda (cover is not as colorful over here in the U.S.!) and will read it and pass it on to my knitting group friends. Really appreciate all the resources you provide us here on this blog: interesting books, wonderful photos, and such rich essays on crafting.
LikeLike
I loved Margery Allingham’s books when I first read them in 1972. However, after rereading many of them this past year, I was disturbed by anti-Semitic and racially insensitive remarks by various characters. I guess I’m more aware than I was back then, and I’m sad that I can’t bring myself to reread an author whom I once admired.
LikeLike
I re-read books a lot. I like the mindless cozy mysteries, which are the ones that get re-read most. However, I read Handywoman twice and am about to start Wheest again. To me, there is something missed the first time through a book. Sometimes you want to miss it, other times you can’t “see” it because you are not “ready” for it, hence re-reading lets you “see” what you missed. I really appreciate the new areas of thought that you present to me, Kate! Oh, and today on my Virtual Fiber Group an English lady showed off the crumpets she was making in her kitchen in Washington state. I told her that it reminded me of Tom’s post, she said she would go and read his post!
LikeLike
It is obvious that Russia has its fingers in the pie here in the U.S.. The Brexit mess seems to be a similar situation. The right wing up surge in so many other places seems to be connected. One book that I read to try to see if all these thing are really connected is ” The Road to Unfreedom”, by Timothy Snyder.
The further I read the more pages were filled with under linings and arrows.
LikeLike
Crumpets one day and praxis the next? I.am.loving.it. More please.
And since my budget doesn’t extend to books right now, I’ll file this away for when/if the libraries ever re-open. Thanks for a brilliant discussion.
LikeLike
I read voraciously, treating various moods with specific genres that I know from experience help me find balance. Lately I’ve been deep in economics, leavened (ha!) with Lawrence Wright’s eerily prescient “The End of October. ” I haven’t read Pomarantsev before, but your post today, combined with Wright’s novel that doesn’t feel at all fictional, has moved “This Is Not Propaganda” to the top of my to read list.
I love Jane’s Radio 4 perspective on disenchantment! If ever there was a time for us shed the shackles of illusion and its barriers to facing the hard truths of what our civilization is careening toward, surely it is now. Thank you again for being such a generous font of creativity and thought.
LikeLiked by 2 people
I have so enjoyed your daily blog posts during the current pandemic lockdown, and I am thrilled to learn about Margery Allingham’s books! With her many titles available I will be happily reading for weeks. Thank you!
LikeLike
Thank you Kate for your insights and sharing authors. I love English mysteries and looked up Josephine Tey and selected one of her books as an audible. This morning my daughter brought over her stationary bike for me to borrow during this period of isolation. It has a table attached to it. I had my knitting and audible going at the same time. How lovely! Finally, thank you for the word disenchantment. It’s a better way of looking at the situation because it allows hope and gratitude to filter in as our paradigms shifts to a whole new way of living.
LikeLiked by 2 people
amazing multi-tasking, Mary!
LikeLike
PS The Franchise Affair and Bratt Farrar are my favourites
LikeLiked by 1 person
You made me smile!
LikeLike
As I have been listening to the “panicked” urges to get back to work (by the rich owners of the companies, mostly) that disregard the potential for the spread of the SARs-Cov-2 virus, it twigged a memory for me of an old book in economics. Back in the 1980’s my professors were reading a popular book called “The 4th Wave” by Alvin Toffler. I don’t think I read it thru, what I did read was more to impress them and converse about it a bit. His thesis was the 1st wave of economics was agriculture, the second was industrial and the third, where we are now, is, digital, or globally computer-based. He said the 4th wave would be the 1st and 2nd wave catching up to the 3rd.
I wonder, then, if all this panic is really mostly naval gazing on the part of those who stand to lose the most…the big guys. Maybe the 4th wave is stepping back from the global somewhat, so that local companies (like KDD) are the ones people turn to. In my area, people have been turning to local farms for food because food the in grocery stores is so erratic in quality and quantity. I can get far more by ordering from local shops that I can from large global chains.
So there is my re-read, or at least a step into the reading past. The little people can re-create the economic future.
And thanks for naming Gallico. I have been trying to remember his name for months now.
LikeLiked by 1 person
I’m with Rebecca – following the news in a daily, rationed kind of way, contributing time and money to pressing social needs and political action, and feeling completely unable to tackle the big picture books – although I read the reviews when they come out, and am grateful that people like Kate are tackling them and commenting on them. When I was working hard in public health science I had no mental energy for anything but engrossing fiction in my spare time, and retirement initially granted time and energy for the big analyses, but right now I can’t seem to cope with them. Like another commenter, I’m revisiting my shelves to see what can go – can I cull those old issues of Granta? Atwood, Munro, A. S. Byatt will all stay, for their hard looks at interpersonal relations within their social environments. The revisiting involves working my way through some favourite poets (Larkin most recently and now Heaney), and Karen Armstrong’s broad surveys of religious traditions, including my own – but all these, too, are likely to remain on my shelves. Would really love to read the Borrowers books again and will look out for them when libraries reopen. Kate, I came, years ago, for the knitting, the wool, and the glimpses of Scotland, and remain for the so-much-more that you and your guest bloggers offer. Thank you.
LikeLiked by 6 people
This Is Not Propaganda is a book I’ve been meaning to read for a while; it was good to hear your thoughts on it. Thank you.
I’m not much of a re-reader in general – although, I do a lot of underlining in paper books / highlighting in ebooks, and often revisit the passages that stood out to me. That’s normally enough. The only exception I can think of is Ali Smith, I’ve read several of her books at least twice, sometimes more. And some Virginia Woolf too. Like you I sometimes return to childhood reading if I’m ill.
At the moment I’m reading (more devouring, really) Jenny Odell’s How To Do Nothing.
LikeLiked by 2 people
You know, I have been totally out of touch with this sort of book – I’ve felt my calling to be more in learning contentment with being present inside an even smaller sphere of influence than I had before. Being ok with being a small person in a big world, and reading books from the past that set an ancient path for the future, recasting them in present understandings of social justice. This gives a sort of logic to my world that I need in order to move forward. But it brings me great comfort to know that people like you and these authors are trying to make sense of this wider picture. I can’t read the same books, but I need your insights.
LikeLiked by 5 people
Well, I feel that *your* insight, Rebecca – that we can only really be present and act within our own small (real, impactful) sphere – is perhaps the most valuable of all.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Am I disenchanted ? Yes. But more than that, I am frightened. Frightened for what will or will not happen with our November 2020 election in the US. Sounds like a fascinating book, but for me the world has gone beyond philosophical discourse to the reality of angry people carrying assault weapons into our houses of government, lies about pandemic numbers and Russian election influence.
LikeLiked by 1 person
I found this book a useful way of mustering energy to face that frightening reality.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Josephine, I’m with you. I live in Portland,Oregon. In a way we sometimes feel like we live in a bubble.
We are frightened by the anger, the justification of carrying assault rifles, deifying a president who clearly is insane and most importantly we have lost our freedom of democracy.
LikeLiked by 2 people
I usually read about a book a week, which means most of my books come from the library and go right back. Alas, now libraries are, quite rightly, closed for the duration. This has lead me to spend an afternoon sorting through my shelves to find the books that I purchased with good intentions, but never finished (or, in a few cases, never started!). Often, these are very loooong books purchased from used booksellers. An unanticipated advantage is that almost none of them have anything to do with our current situation. It makes a change from the themes of my online reading, that’s for sure! My local bookstore is doing “curbside delivery,” like books are take-away curries: perhaps I’ll put this one on the list for when I have exhausted my current reserves.
LikeLiked by 1 person
There were a couple of typos in my reply. I’d be grateful if you could correct them to this:
I’ve never heard of Peter Pomerantsev before, so thanks for this article.
My mum is an ex history teacher and she has a love of Russia – with all its problems – that makes her challenge our own British views of the world. I would say she’s very protective of Russia, not so much the politics, but the ordinary people.
I’m about to order the book for her and wondered where you buy your books from, online, whilst still supportIn the independents that are still closed. Any recommendations?
LikeLike
I often my books directly from publishers, and notice that you can currently order single titles like Pomerantsev’s directly from Faber:
https://www.faber.co.uk/
and here are a couple of great independents:
https://www.lighthousebookshop.com
http://www.samreadbooks.co.uk
LikeLike
Thank you for your review, which certainly made me want to read the book. Like you I have been trying to read far and wide to understand our world a little better, my most recent read was ‘Mindf*ck’ the inside story of Cambridge Analytica. I still can’t compute the very real damage that this firm did and probably is doing under another name to democracy and the fact that so little was done to bring them to justice.
On another plane altogether Marjorie Allingham is one of my comfort reads. Not that I get much chance to go back and re-read. One way I deal with anxiety is to buy more and more books to ‘help me understand’ to the extent that I never manage to finish one reading thread before I am off on several others. Thank you so much for such regular updates, it is one of the little high points in my day to see what is on the blog.
LikeLiked by 3 people
Years ago I read “our lady of the lost and found by diane schoemperlen” since then this book pops in my mind. Maybe I should re-read it. Normaly I give books away but this one. I still have it. 😁
LikeLike
Sounds good to me
LikeLike
I have started reading books again because I am trying to reduce my library. Last night I picked up a collection of The Borrowers books, from childhood, and began reading again, without much hope of enjoyment, but actually found it rather engrossing. Other books I read a page or two and just know that I should never have kept them in the first place.
LikeLiked by 1 person
It sounds like a fascinating book – I’ve read his previous one and will definitely read this one. I’m currently reading Sarah Kendzior’s ‘Hiding In Plain Sight’ about the rise of Trump and how inextricably tied he is to Russia, and how essentially, thanks to a network of global organised crime that’s infiltrated our institutions and corrupted our politics, all roads lead there. I think you might enjoy it!
LikeLiked by 1 person
sounds up my street . . .
LikeLike
I recently heard an interview on radio 4 where the interviewee discussed the work disenchantment. In fairy tails it is a positive outcome where people regain their ‘true’ nature (the swans become seven brothers, the frog becomes a prince etc.). By contrast in ‘real life’ we talk about disenchantment as a sad thing, but maybe we all need to be disenchanted, and to recognise reality (even though reality is probably more frog than prince)! I shall certainly be ordering and reading this book. Thank you for the recommendation.
LikeLiked by 4 people
I like this take on disenchantment, Jane!
LikeLike
One of my favourite writers. I started with his first book Nothing is True. Eveything is Possible. Adventures in Modern Russia and have been following all Pomarantsev’s talks and media appearances, since.
LikeLiked by 1 person