When you are involved in the slow creative process, you get fairly used to the fact that things often don’t work out first time. I have lots of ideas, and very few of them work out or come to anything that you might call fruition. I try many things, and I throw an awful lot of ideas away. In general, I tend not to discuss or reveal such partial or discarded ideas here, as they can become projects I return to, niggle away at, and from which something interesting eventually emerges. But I sometimes think that it’s a shame that what you read about here is mostly what has been finished – because the things-in-process, the half-formed (or half-baked) ideas are really what I’m working with most of the time. And I certainly think that trying out many different things, and being comfortable when they don’t work out, is the key to my creative process.

Working on my Cadaver Exquisito with Pilar Obeso Sánchez – my Mexican collaborator – has certainly taken a long time and, from my end at least, has involved quite a few ideas which didn’t work out, particularly when creating my creature’s head/ mask. But over time, and after many discarded ideas, and many abandoned objects, my creature has eventually manifested itself, as you’ll soon see. So I thought I’d try to explain how my creature developed, through its key elements.

First there was the creature’s body, for which which my inspirations were costumes used in Mexican masked rituals (which continually mingle objects and symbols from a range of traditions and cultures in a particularly joyful kind of syncretism) and Pilar’s favourite pin-badge adorned denim jacket (which kind of did much the same thing).

Creatively interpreted by me, Pilar’s jacket would become a pair of dungarees / overalls, whose decoration would speak to many of the themes of our collaboration. There would be Harris Tweed, which we’d both seen being made in the Hebrides. There would be Scottish agate jewellery, whose Victorian popularity we’d discussed during our visit to Braemar. There would be mountains, connecting Scotland and Oaxaca. And there would be Mr Benn, a nostalgic figure from my childhood (whom I’d shared with Pilar) who captured the transformative and imaginative power of dressing up.

The overalls would be connected to my body by a strap which was as long as Pilar was tall (both of us are quite wee). After learning about how practices of band weaving connected the textile traditions of Northern Europe to those of South America during our residency, I decided to hand-weave this strap.

I learned a few different techniques and styles of band weaving from the brilliant Belinda Rose, and, after spending several months weaving different braids and bands, I eventually wove my strap using a pick-up method on my new inkle loom.

I also had a strong, clear idea for my creature’s “top”, a kind of mash-up of the Scottish colourwork yoke sweater with the Mexican huipil.

I’d knit my Mexican-Scottish huipil-yoke in homage to Pilar’s everyday environs, designing it to echo the warm colours of her home in Mexico City, and the wee shady patio where she loved to sit.

So far so good. My creature had a body and a top but lacked a head.

Pilar and I talked a lot about masks.

I read a lot about masks.

I thought a lot about masks.

I started making masks.
I attempted a couple of papier maché masks, layering up scraps of old issues of Private Eye and worn out Ordnance Survey maps of my part of Scotland. These masks were fine and they were certainly wearable, but I found their surface appearance aesthetically uninteresting. So I then tried my hand at sculpting a mask out of the kind of clay that’s used in classrooms. This mask had a pleasingly freaky appearance, but felt lopsided and heavy when worn . . then bits kept falling off, until the whole thing spectacularly disintegrated. So I then tried working with a different, lighter kind of clay, into which I’d embedded numerous glass eyes. This was an interesting idea, but it just didn’t look as good as I’d envisaged. My next attempt involved combining the glass eyes with some millinery felt and insulation tubing. I was hoping this construction might achieve a fantastical and weird appearance, but really it just looked kind of rubbish. So I reverted back to papier mache, and tried painting yet another kind of mask . . . but if there’s one thing I know about myself it is that I am not very good at either painting or drawing, when any degree of figurative representation is involved. The painted mask was probably my worst, and yet, it was perhaps beaten by my next attempt. I thought I’d be on safe ground with stranded colourwork, but the knitted gimp look was a bit too much, even for me.

Then suddenly, another kind of mask became the focus of worldwide attention. Masks were the subject of debate, they were things to be worn in public settings, to protect everyone from infection. Everyone was wearing masks, and many of us were making them too. Methods of, and patterns for, creating a wonderful range of masks proliferated, as the global making community collaborated in creating these simple pieces of wearable, functional design. I loved how handmade masks so rapidly expressed the creative energies of stitchers around the world, and how, in both their making and their wearing, they became emblems of human connection and solidarity. I was very happy to make and wear masks. But I grew heartily weary of everyone shouting at each other about “right” or “wrong” mask wearing (or wearers), and of seeing such masks come to symbolise human divisions as much as their connections.

A mask was key to my collaboration with Pilar, but it was not that kind of mask. I began to reflect upon what it might mean to make a mask of any kind at a time when such objects seemed to have acquired such a very limited range of global meanings. It occurred to me that, however little the pandemic had to do with my and Pilar’s creative collaboration, a masked element to our costume might lead it to invariably being read in that context. And this troubled me, because around that time, I was starting to feel a little tired of everyone frantically “responding” to the pandemic, especially when they were trying to wrest some sort of increasingly banal “creative” element from the experience of lockdown. I felt quite strongly, in fact, that what Pilar and I were doing together had absolutely nothing to do with the pandemic – and that it was very important that we tried to keep our shared creative work in a space that was separate from that situation. But I totally failed to consider that the fact that we were even trying to create work during that time meant that this could never be the case. Simply because we were collaborating during 2020, 2020 would set the terms of our collaboration. That this was unavoidably the case quickly became quite obvious.

Last Spring, Pilar suffered a family loss, left her job, travelled from Mexico City to Madrid, dealt with various lockdown situations, and began a new course of remote study on the other side of the world to her home. Here in Scotland I was absolutely fine, and my family and business were fine too, but there were many rapid and rather difficult changes to implement, as well as urgent situations to respond to and manage. Separated from her home context and materials, dealing with bereavement, Pilar was unable to work on our collaboration and, it was difficult, too, for me, to muster much creative inclination. I simply didn’t have the time or any creative headspace to think, with a fresh mind, about what my mask might mean or look like in this moment. And beyond Pilar and myself, venues were unable to open and creative organisations were dealing with a wide range of pressing issues. Submission deadlines were shifted, and planned exhibitions cancelled or postponed.

So my incomplete creature remained in its rather forlorn and headless state until a few weeks ago, when I returned to it with a couple of realisations. First, the fact that the creature had been developed during 2020 meant that this time, and the meanings of this time, would unavoidably be constitutive of the finished piece—and that was fine. Second, I saw on reflection that my numerous failed masks had been a classic case of what can be a common problem with me: one of overdetermination. I had read an awful lot about Mexican masks. I had done a lot of careful research, and spent an awful lot of time thinking about masks’ making and their meaning. I wanted the mask I made to not just be good, but really amazing. I had thought too much and had been trying far too hard.
So I reached for two techniques which generally work for me when I get creatively stuck. First, to try something simple, and second, to try something new.


The something simple was to return to some early ideas I’d had about the Burryman, wool, and pompoms . . .

The something new was to attempt making simple and brightly coloured woolly shapes through needle felting.

Have you ever tried needle felting? All I can say is that stabbing wool batts with sharp needles is certainly an extremely satisfying way to spend a few hours, here and there.

It also seems to be a pretty forgiving, and fairly easy craft for a total beginner to use to sculpt nice woolly shapes (I say this from my very limited and completely basic experience – the idea that you might create entire scenes or wee animals using this technique is to me astounding).

Anyway, after 18 months, several failed attempts, and a very long creative process, under the transformative magic of felted wool, the head of my creature has finally appeared.

I hope you’ve not minded my rather lengthy exploration of the things that worked, the things that didn’t work, and the things that temporarily scuppered or halted the creation of my creature’s head. I’ve learned a lot from the process of creating my Mexican-Scottish woolly-headed creature — about my tendency towards overdetermination, about my desire to control meaning (which is always impossible), about the importance of stepping away from something, and the necessity of returning to a project with fresh eyes, mind. . . . and hands.
Tomorrow the woolly-headed Carbeth Creature shall reveal itself!
I always enjoy your thoughtful writing Kate and hearing about your process is both heartening and inspiring. I often talk with my team about sitting in discomfort – that tricky space where ideas and concepts are not fully materialised and a final outcome can feel very far away. Although I am good at talking about this I find it very challenging myself. Both my professional and personal practice are very much centered on letting go of the desire for a perfect controlled outcome on my terms. I was particularly struck with your comment about controlling meaning.
LikeLiked by 1 person
I enjoyed this post so much – thank you for taking the time to write it. I can really relate to the ratio of started ideas vs. resolved/finished ideas, and also to the necessary slow pace involved in bringing creative projects to their full conclusion.
Hurrah for the half-finished and half-baked spaces of uncertainty where making mostly happens!
It’s so amazing to read about the spirit of cultural exchange running through this work, and I love the sheer materiality of your creative research process – learning to weave on an inkle loom; trial and error with yarn to find just the right colour/pattern combination to speak to Pilar’s beloved shady patio in Mexico; the pleasure and critical thought involved in pin-badge curation; and then the many material experiments of MASK-MAKING.
It’s really hard for anything created in 2020/2021 not to take on a level of MEANING/context from the Pandemic, and it’s almost impossible to insulate any creative process from the time when we are making the work, as the moment in history creates such a large part of the frame. Reading your thoughts, I’m reminded of the artist Steven Vitiello. He made this work in 1999 by placing contact-microphones on the windows near the top of the World Trade Centre. Whatever formal interest lay behind that project, the resulting sounds and recordings it produced have taken on a completely different meaning and significance in a post 9/11 world – something far beyond the intentions of the artist, and out of his control.
It was so interesting to read your thoughts about trying to control the meaning of the work and the whole issue of overdetermination. I think rigour and research vs. instinct and uncertainty are some of the things in constant balance when trying to make new work. Thanks again for this fascinating process story.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Thank you for writing about failed ideas. In the push to show results, I tend to ignore or bury my many false starts. And I thought that only I was troubled by these (so-called) dead ends. Your tale is reassuring and encouraging to me.
LikeLiked by 1 person
As always fascinating and interesting
LikeLiked by 1 person
I loved reading your account of the creative process your went through – how you followed where inspiration led you, not minding the time or the quality of the result. I find it very freeing – thank you!
LikeLiked by 1 person
Thanks Kate, as a maker this was such an encouraging post. Knowing when to stop and leave something is a lesson I am still learning. I think I’ll print this out and put it with the Wheesht book which was the place I learnt to ‘just start’. Starting and stopping and staying with something…still learning! Thank you
LikeLiked by 1 person
I will quote you – “I certainly think that trying out many different things, and being comfortable when they don’t work out, is the key to my creative process” – when I need to remind myself to *relax* when things don’t work out. Over-determination is an obstruction for me, too.
Getting things right the first time – scoring 100% on every exam – isn’t the point. Another useful mantra: “don’t let perfect be the enemy of good”.
I do agree that the use of prophylactic masks during a pandemic will overwhelm the whole idea of masking for some time to come. I look forward to seeing how you’ve made your mask your own.
LikeLiked by 1 person
I like to see the creative process and the things that didn’t work. Thank you.
LikeLiked by 1 person
I’m with Elaine here! Your comments on “over determination” hit home. The desire to create the “ perfect” object or whatever can definitely stymie the creative process. In some of us, it’s extremely difficult to move forward at all. Thank you for sharing these thoughts. Cheers!
LikeLiked by 1 person
I’ve just finished reading Veronica O’Keane’s book you recommended, The Rag and Bone Shop. I LOVE the way your mind and creative energies work. Yes, I knit. But it is these creative wanderings which delight me so much. You are a treasure in the world and I am so glad I am able to know you though this blog.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Yes and yes and yes! The creative process is so messy, mentally and visually. For me, blogging the finished product is in itself a necessary part of the creative process because it allows me to resolve a narrative that has been mostly messy into something beautiful and meaningful. But this makes the blog post itself into a kind of mask. So, thanks for the peek behind!
LikeLiked by 1 person
I can’t wait to see it!!
LikeLiked by 1 person
I loved reading about your process in this post and look forward to tomorrow’s reveal. I find with creative work so often what is discarded from one project propels or feeds into another. So although it can feel wasteful in the longer view not so much is wasted, and in any event it is all practising and finessing our skills. And I can really personally relate to how over-thinking and trying too hard can paralyse a work-in-progress.
There can be something tyrannical in only ever seeing the finished object or output for creative work, and I find it liberating to see how much any finished item depends on going through a process. I’ll never forget in one of my creative writing MA seminars, when our tutor entered the room weighted down by carrying an absolutely ginormous stack of folders filled with countless pages. They were all the drafts for one of his long-form poems. It made the point very well.
LikeLiked by 1 person
I am fascinated to read about the whole creative process, and looking forward to tomorrow’s reveal!
LikeLike
No, on the contrary, the description of the creative process is fascinating and strangely comforting… to know that even you, who create such knitted marvels, can struggle, discard, feel inadequate. I think the past year, and more and more this one too, has put us in such isolation that we have looked at ourselves more deeply and differently. Realized our strengths and shortcomings. Become more aware of our creative personalities. Knitting is my method of procrastination, as long as I am knitting something, I’m allowed not to risk going ahead with other things. Try as I might, all the ideas I have in my head, and there are a few, are pushed aside and I take up my knitting comfort blanket…
LikeLiked by 2 people
Interesting to see that someone else has a tendency to use knitting as procrastination. This is something I’ve succumbed to at times, and I’ve often wondered how widespread it is. In fact it’s something I’m planning to write a short piece about. (Soon, honest!)
LikeLiked by 1 person
Thank you for such an enlightening post, Kate. I guess lots of us strive to “get it right “ at the first try. Perhaps we’ve all put things aside or abandoned them because they just didn’t meet our expectations, only to be brought back out and reworked or renewed in some way.
Thank you for being there.
LikeLiked by 1 person